Brilliant.
iPad: The Morning After
Alright, I've cooled off a bit. I've listened to hours and hours of podcasts and read through virtual reams of opinions, taking in everyone's opinion on the iPad. Yes it's got some obvious flaws . But I only ever wanted to get hold of a device that allows me to read regular books and comics - and this does it. Probably does it really well in fact. Plus, it's backlit, unlike most other e-readers.
I got word from Bitolithic, developer of the best iPhone comic viewer Comiczeal, that he was already starting development for an iPad-optimized version. Huzzah.
So how do I feel now? I am looking forward to its release. But there is one really big question left: will Apple allow the Kindle iPhone app on the iPad? Or will they disallow it since it competes with their iBooks Store?
After all the hub-bub with Macmillan's price fight with Amazon , their removal and subsequent re-instatement, I'm not sure if Amazon would even want the Kindle app to work on the iPad. I sure hope they put it on there so no matter what I get the best price on any given book. How much would it suck if all the books on iBooks were $12.99 - $14.99, but could be had by Kindle users for much less (there are many on Kindle for only $6.99).
This begs a bigger question: when, oh when , will content producers (publishers, movie studios, etc...) realize that people are never going to pay the same prices for digital versions of things as the physical versions? They are only making it worse for themselves by not releasing books, movies, and DVDs the same day as the physical versions, but for less money. Piracy is still too complicated for most people. If there's a simple, legal option, and a price benefit, then much less people will be forced to seek out illicit versions.
Apple's iPad Won't Kill Netbooks and Other Complaints
So the iPad has been revealed. I wrote earlier that I am underwhelmed by the iPad because it lacks multi-tasking, Flash, has an almost identical interface to the iPod touch, can cost $30/mo., has a supposedly mediocre on-screen keyboard, and makes me think of menstrual cycles. But it is very interesting in the ebook department.
That last part is the key for me personally. I already read books and comics on my iPhone and would probably be happy to pay $500 for a giant iPod Touch - which is all this really is. And that's the disappointment: they didn't create a new and specialized user interface like I was really expecting. I mean the home screen icons are still tiny and now just spread apart awkwardly, much like the honeycomb arrangement on phones using Windows Mobile 6.5. I think that's ugly and not really adjusted correctly for a larger screen tablet.
BUT if they want to kill Netbooks, at least for nerds, they NEED Flash. How stupid is it to visit sites like Hulu and see big empty spaces where video should be? This is the worst part probably, and stings so much because they want this device to be a media powerhouse, especially in the video department. But my dreams of not having to boot up my Macbook to look at websites in my free time are killed. The iPad internet browser is crippled like the iPhone and iTouch, which makes since for those devices (I hate to imagine how awful browsing on the iPhond would be if Adobe had their way), but makes zero sense on an iPad. It's an internet tablet for Crom's sake.
And don't get me started on the $30/month fee for wireless data. I actually wouldn't mind paying that if my iPhone data went down in price by $20/month - but it doesn't. So with an iPad I could be paying $60/month JUST for wireless internet. I already pay that much for internet in my home. If Chelsea wanted one of these too, with 3G (in addition to her iPhone), we'd be paying as almost as much as a car loan for all of our internet access - about $170 EVERY MONTH. I'm a nerd but that's absurd!
I'm not alone in my mixed feelings, either. Most of the Engadget crew have conflicted opinions, and one person at Gizmodo concludes that the different negatives all add up to a deal-breaker. Another makes the point that despite its failings, we'll all want these anyways. Even Walt Mossberg thinks that it's going to be up to the application developers to make or break this device, not Apple. Lastly, David Pogue, my favorite mainstream tech columnist, thinks we're all being too negative and that we'll love the device once it's released.
[Note: For the record, yes there is no such thing as an iTouch, but if they're willing to use the name iPad, iTouch would've been a better option, and one that doesn't remind you of lady things.]
The Day the Earth Caught Fire [1962] - Review
What a great find. Fine British film that seems pretty unknown but should be considered a classic and studied. It feels like a sci-fi/disaster version of The Wire.
I'll let a few words from a biographer and director Val Guest himself describe this the best way it could be:
"At a time when the vast majority of science fiction films were populated by aliens, blobs and bug-eyed monsters, Val Guest brought his trademarks of intelligence, seriousness and realism to the genre...Perhaps inspired by his background as a journalist, Guest chose to shoot his fantasy films in a gritty documentary style...'That's the only way to make the unbelievable believable...You have to do these science fiction things like you would any other drama...I tried to present them like strange but very real events at which a camera just happened to be present.'"
Amen.
I Should be More Excited About the Apple Tablet
So today Apple has officially acknowledged that they're introducing a new product later this month (had only been rumored previously).
I find myself concerned and hesitant to get too excited. While I have been wanting an Apple tablet device for years now, I am afraid for it's success.
I've always loved tablet PCs (owned 2 of them). But I'm not representative of the larger market: tablet computers have remained very niche. Just look at how little press has been given to the HP slate Microsoft unveiled at CES - there's a good chance you've never even heard about it. Even within the tech world it's been yawned over, not fawned over.
So how will Apple surmount the consumer confusion and indifference that's prevented tablets from taking off? And even if people like the device, if its price is as high as rumored ($600-$800, some say as high as $1000), it had better do some really fancy new stuff.
I'm also concerned about its rumored tie to a cellphone carrier like Verizon that would require a monthly contract. That would probably be a deal-breaker for me. The last thing I need is another 2 year contract with a monthly bill.
It just seems like there are a lot of things it will need to overcome to be successful so it doesn't end up like the Apple TV. How many people do you know who own an Apple TV?
My skepticism betrays a deeply held hope that it will be a fantastic product and succeed fabulously, as the iPhone has in the smartphone market - a market which arguably presented more competition than tablet PCs currently do.
Ultimately my dream is to hold a 7" - 10" device that allows me to download and read books and comics in color for long stretches of time and to be able to browse the web with Flash (I don't want Flash anywhere near my phone). On the 27th we'll see whether they've cooked up another hit or their first big miss in a while.
White House thanks Lieberman for blocking President's reform promise, but now criticizes Howard Dean for defending it
Absolutely infuriating. Is Obama totally distracted by escalating
Afghanistan and the world climate change summit and his staff have got
the whole debate backwards?!
I mean it's mind-boggling that they'd prod Lieberman towards further
killing the most important legislation of a generation.
There's also a fundamental flaw here with the way the Senate works
that this one person or a handful of peole end up with all of the
power. Majority rule: we only need 51 votes for anything there but
these few can hold up an kill such important progress.
The combined bill with the House better include a real public option
(no triggers, maybe opt-out by state). Although no matte what now the
most essential element for controlling cost is out of both: there
won't be a govenment body setting the rates for health care services.
Fucking garbage. Hey Americans, don't get sick, if you do, die quickly
because the US Government and health insurance companies hate you.
http://www.americablog.com/2009/12/white-house-thanks-lieberman-for.html
Erik via iPhone
Truth Make Bill O'Reilly Mad, No Room for Debate
From a recent episode of Law & Order: SVU:
"Limbaugh, Beck, O'Reilly, all of 'em, they are like a cancer spreading ignorance and hate...They've convinced folks that immigrants are the problem, not corporations that fail to pay a living wage or a broken health care system..."
Bill O'Reilly:
"Dick Wolf is a coward for putting that out there, he is also a liar..."
Yes, making your point on one of the most-watched television shows in the country is cowardly, it takes no courage to do that.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
